Shooting the breeze with an old colleague recently who we’re about to start some serious work with. He’s just not sure of the timing as yet because he needs to “clear” one of those IT “audits” that are performed as part of the yearly financial audit by some Big guys. You know the ones.

He can’t start on serious security review and testing until he’s fixed up some major issues identified by them like his IT Security Policy not being aligned to the latest revision of 27001, 7799 whatever, etc etc, plus a few other major issues such as password lengths on some non-critical systems that few people use. It doesn’t matter whether the policies themselves are actually being complied with so he’s going to be able to clear that point by creating a bit of policy documentation, that in reality has no relevance to the environment but, at least that will please the auditor and he’ll then be one step closer to “passing” the audit. Management will be happy and the organisation deemed secure. He’s in a good position though in that his management also realises that it’s all BS and they have set aside money to undertake some real assessment of their security position. Few companies though see it this way sadly.

(more…)



Just read this post here at SecurityFocus re: a proposed Researcher Council. Interesting ideas put forward and certainly something worth considering.



I just posted a response here to my previous rant on this.

This is one we can debate for a long time and probably deserves a full paper on it. But even then, will it make a difference between reality and “published” reality?

Posted in: Uncategorized


Computer glitches, software errors….lets blame the technology as usual. Saw this article today on the front page of the Townsville Bulliten. (Net version posted here). On first read in the paper version, it read like the lady noted the win, got the clarification from the husband on the amount being over 21.4M and then decided to play on. I thought, only in Australia; “lets play it down to a cool 21M and pull out then!” :-) Hey, still not convinced it didn’t happen and then the bloody error message pops up! “Come on!!! I still wanted to play the other 400 odd thousand!”.

On a serious note, recent failures of software on; planes leading to injuries and near disasters, manufacturing meltdowns, major road and tunnel closures etc etc – and yet as a society, we continue to not see the dangerous path upon which we travel.

Recent related post.

Posted in: Bad Stuff, Too cool, WTF


Playing “war-games” like those played by the “good guys”, ie; the US and allies, is akin to setting up a game of “Monopoly” and controlling each roll of the dice to ensure that you end up with “Mayfair” and 2/3 of the 3 remaining players get all the other good stuff and the remaining person, (the bad guy) is left to defeat the rest of you….with the probability bias!

And guess what? They do!

Malcolm Gladwell in his book, “Blink”, relates such a story of war games undertaken before the first Gulf War. An “old head” (Lt. Gen. Paul Van Riper) is assigned as the leader of the “Red Team” (the bad guys) – left with nothing but his mind, experience and gut feel to base his attack and defence upon. The good guys, the “Blue Team” use computers, simulations and data crunching to develop their plans. Surprise surprise….the old head destroys the major force of the good guys within a day. Game over you would think, but hey, this is a war game…..lets change the rules to suit us……

(more…)



By Declan Ingram

Kiwicon 2008 has come to a close and the crowds have left with a trail of coffee cups and empty beer kegs. The line up this year for the second annual New Zealand IT Security / Hacker Conference included a mixture of the usual suspects and first time presenters, which is always good to see.

Highlights this year included “The Paul Craig Omnibus”, Brett Moore’s “Hacking Citrix in 2008″ and Longpipes’ “Sekret Lightning Talk”.

(more…)



« Newer Posts